Reaction to Tanya Trusler's 9 Simple Steps for teaching ed and ing adjectives
Damian Francis
For many years, English
has been the most interesting foreign language for Dominicans. It has become
very popular in the Dominican Republic for many reasons: Some people do it because
they want to get a better job or because they are on the process of
getting a green card, others do it to apply for a scholarship in an American
university, and other people for different more reasons. During the learning process, learners tend to get confused with some grammar rules. Most of the time, they are due to their first language
interference. One of these grammar aspects that teachers have to deal with is
the teaching of ed and ing adjectives. Tanya Trusler suggests us 9 different
steps that could be helpful to teach our students how to apply them
correctly.
According to Trusler, what teachers
first have to do is to remind students that there are two adjectives
patterns: one is be + adjective, and the
other one is adjective + noun. The
author says that the second step is to say the students that ed and ing
adjectives are to describe feelings, and then he or she should give students
some examples, such as interesting /interested, boring/bored, and so forth. The
step three is to explain to students that adjectives in ing ending are used
when the noun is the reason or cause of the feeling, for example the baseball
game was exciting. It means that the baseball game is the reason or cause of feeling
that way.
Ms. Trusler says that step 4 is to
work on ing adjectives +nouns. She gives some examples to illustrate this
pattern. For example: this is a boring movie. This example is used to show that
the noun movie is the reason or cause of my feeling of boredom. According to
her, the next step is for introducing ing adjectives with the following
pattern: be + adjective. In order to teach this aspect, the teacher should say
that ed adjectives describe how a person is feeling. Then the teacher gives an
example.
The sixth step is for explaining
students the ed adjective. Adj + N pattern. The author says this form is
possible, but it is not often used. Steps from 7 to 9 that have to do with
the explanation of cause and effect, the exceptions, and the material for
advanced students. The teacher only conceptualizes and give examples, but he
never allows students to apply what they had been explained.
Grammar teaching from my point of
view is one of the aspects that has brought a lot of confusion in English as a
foreign language teaching. I disagree with the methodology presented by Tanya
Trusler because I think that the strategies she suggests could not be effective in EFl classrooms. Although, I
am one of those teachers that strongly believe there is not a unique way for
teaching grammar, the one presented by the author would make teachers spend too
much time explaining and conceptualizing about grammar aspects that are not
necessary.
I consider that it is not a good
idea to explain that there are two possible patterns, either be + adjective or
adjective + noun. To me it is better to do activities in which students
discover the grammar structures by themselves. When it comes to the methodology
suggested by the author, I think that it could not allow students to have effective
English language learning because it is too traditional. From my point of view,
it is teacher’s centered. I did not see any suggestion in which students apply
the knowledge. I did not see the moment in which the teacher explored students’
knowledge, either.
I strongly believe that grammar
teaching has to be taught in context. It does not matter if it is inductively
or deductively, to me both work, it will depend on the student’s age and
learning style. From my stand point, it is not a good idea to say that a
specific strategy works for every student. Taking into account my teaching
experience, what makes student internalize a grammar rule is by exposing them
and giving them the opportunity to apply it in context.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario